Answer:
From the Web-Site of the MBS: http://maranathabiblesociety.org/studies/gods_word
What follows are VERBATUM from the above Hyperlinked document
Page 2:
“We must believe that the Bible is inerrant and infallible…”
Page 3:
“In my
creedal statement, my first point reads: "I believe the Bible (KJV) is the
inspired, inerrant, infallible Word of God." I believe in verbal
plenary inspiration.”
“…we must
acknowledge an inerrant and infallible…”
Page 4:
"Pure"
cannot mean anything less than that the Holy Spirit so watched over all the
Bible's composition and moved its writers that all error has been
excluded.
“…in the Word of God not one jot or tittle can be errant.”
Page 5:
“We must be very careful lest we detract in the
smallest degree from the perfect and full inspiration of the Holy Scripture.”
Page 14:
“The KJV is not simply another publication out on
the open market of religious books - it is the Word of God, of which He Himself
will not alter one word!”
Page 15:“I must believe the Word of God is inspired, inerrant, and infallible…”
“…when we fail to stand on the absolute inerrancy
and infallibility of the Word of God”
Dear Ken Brandt; President of the Maranatha Bible Society, Deciple of Richard E. Rhoades, exposotor of Sound Doctrine…kindely explain:
Page 3:
“The Bible nowhere claims to have been written by inspired men”
Page 15:
“Nowhere does the Word of God claim to have been
written by inspired men.”
Page 28:
“From The Translators Revived: "We
don't claim absolute perfection for our English Bible.”
“We do not claim word-for-word perfection for the
Authorized Version, but we do claim verbal perfection and inspiration”
Where is Ken Brandt getting this? Cound it possibally be from the book his fellowship publishes “Transaloters Revived”?
The following quots ARE NOT from Alexander McClure, they are from Richard E. Rhoades who has insulted, profained, and defiled the scholership of this man.
From the book “Transaloters Revived” as published by the Maranatha Bible Society.
“Not that absolute perfection is claimed for our common English Bible”
Page 180:
“Not that the utmost verbal perfection is claimed
for the English Bible as it now stands”
Page 189:
“The work, though not absolutely perfect, nor
incapable of amendment in detached places…”
Excuse me Ken Brandt, excuse me, excuse me. Am I not supposed to notice what a COLLOSEL FARCE you are?
Written by My Hand
Allan Lewicki
Note: For an unadulaterated copy of McClure’s work see:
http://www.archive.org/download/translatorsreviv00mccl/translatorsreviv00mccl.pdf
Check this Blog too: http://religiousvomit3.blogspot.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment